The Recent Falklands Conflict **originally drafted March 16th, 2013
The vast majority of Western civilization tends to display
favor toward Great Britain in its most recent conflict over control of the
Falkland Islands. Despite this being a recurring theme between Argentina and
the United Kingdom, interest worldwide has once again been sparked. Special
consideration should be noted when it comes to this affair, as the Falkland
Islands are disputed to have originally belonged to Argentina and a brief war
was ignited in 1982 in the attempts to regain and maintain control of the
islands. Some would say because of its economically sound location and promising resources.
Viewing this case ethically could provide deeper insight as to why these
islands should belong to the Argentine government.
The Falkland Islands, otherwise known as Islas Malvinas by
the Argentine authority has been the center of international conflict between
the two nations ever since the United Kingdom's official acquisition in the
early 19th century. Issues of ownership were apparent and violent even before
Argentina was declared an independent nation from Spain as recognized by Great
Britain in 1825. Delegates from the city of Buenos Aires decreed in 1829 that
the islands were to be under military and political command of the newly formed
Argentine government, followed by protests from Britain. However, the British
government re-established authority in 1833 and eventually declared the
Falkland Islands to be colonized. A year later General Rosas offered to
relinquish any claim to sovereignty in order for the Argentine debt to the City
of London be considered repaid, an offer that was adamantly refused. The fact
that Argentina took no modern sovereign action until 34 years later and then
with no actions taken again until 1941; it is what allowed Britain to maintain
favor in its command of the islands. These facts cannot be ignored but there
are others involved that have been forcibly ignored for decades. Such as the
fact Argentina was a slow developing country, plagued by nepotism and constant
outside coercions from rivaling nations, of whom which were determined to
plunder Argentina's natural resources and continue to do so.
The United Kingdom is reporting Argentina's "new found
interest" in an almost subtle form of propaganda. It is claimed by members
of British parliament that the possible discovery of abundant oil reserves in
the territory of the islands is Argentina's sole motivation for reclamation.
Foreign Prime Minister of Argentina Hector Timerman announced that he believes
Great Britain's position is the one seeking solely to benefit from harvesting
the oil reserves and, that "one of these companies, Desire Petroleum,
estimated that a potential 3.5 billion barrels of oil and nine trillion cubic
feet of natural gas could lie within the Falklands' territorial waters,
potentially worth at least £25 billion", (Alsop 2013). While Foreign Prime
Minister Hector Timerman publicly admits that he wants Argentina to profit from
the oil, he profusely admonishes the idea that it is Argentina's only interest,
and he firmly believes the Falkland Islands will be under Argentine control
within 20 years.
It is without a doubt that Argentinians are impassioned
about this issue because it is felt that they have consistently been taken
advantage of over the centuries by European nations, as well as the political interventions by the U.S. Dirty dealings and
corruption have run rampant among politicians as outside sources have put
pressure on the government to yield valuable resources for less than half their
worth. Interviews with Argentinians express the only desire is that justice is brought forth and sanctity is
returned to their country in the hopes to better the nation's future as a whole.
On the account of a new census done last year, 2012, six out
of ten residents inhabiting the island identify themselves as "Falkland
Islanders", with their own independent government. A question that should
be asked then is if they should relinquish their rights as British citizens. It
is apparent however, these "independent colonists" would never do
such a thing; enjoying the benefits they receive as both islander and citizen
of the United Kingdom. It also reported that with the possibility of oil
exploration, the residents of the island will become significantly wealthier.
Another question that should be raised is whether or not it is ethically
relevant to aid an impoverished nation in great need of what they consider to
be their own resources. First world countries have repeatedly and blatantly exploited
Argentina due to its inability to properly regulate and defend its territories.
The return of the Falkland Islands would do much to restore Argentina's wealth
and give the country a fighting chance to repair itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment